![]() It's difficult to justify why you would not. You would have the money to equip ALL your firearms with suppression. Therefore, suppression not only keeps YOUR position more difficult to detect, it also is easier on your senses (which is a definite advantage).Īs I mentioned earlier. It's to enhance communication and control.įor them, the M27 is their main weapon. The US Marines are experimenting with entire platoons carrying the M27 (HK 416) suppressed. Is it enough? Well, it won't "hide" you as well but there are other benefits to suppression that make it worthwhile. IF you shoot full power (supersonic) rounds through a suppressor you still get some sound reduction but it's not optimal. ![]() So a suppressed secondary really does make sense.Īnd what if you expect the opposition will be wearing body armor? For me, HK 416. Unless the opposition is wearing body armor the suppressed MP5 will allow you to deal with multiple in-close threats extremely well (without the noise). Subsonic ammo avoids the "crack" of a round going supersonic.īut, of course, it has less velocity and less energy. The bolt cycling makes more noise than the report of the bullet. To get the least noise, I use subsonic ammo (158 grain 9mm). My HK MP5 suppressed is an excellent "secondary". Given the "Contracts" aspect of this episode of the series, suppression seems wise. I've NEVER met any shooter that shot a suppressed weapon but preferred to go without. TLDR: I own an actual HK416, HK MP5 and HK45T that are all suppressed. I'm still trying to decide about purchasing but the OPTION to suppress a secondary is nice. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |